You should go back and read any of the posts where I started out with WRONG WRONG WRONG. They are not directed at anyones opinions, they are directed at factual errors and misconceptions that someone had posted to SUPPORT their opinions. And all of those things were WRONG WRONG WRONG as I went on to explain why after the WRONG WRONG WRONG opening statements and I still stand by them. Yes it might ruffle some feathers but when someone claims that my opinion is mistaken or invalid and them proceeds to explain why with a very flawed snd factually incorrect argument why their opinion is more valid than mine, its quite upsetting and I just comment on the WRONG WRONG WRONG non - F A C T S given in their supporting argument. There is a difference in saying someone elses opinion is wrong, than saying factual matters used in their argument to support their opinion are WRONG WRONG WRONG so to speak. I hope that clears that up. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Savage Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 9:16 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: Please everyone set up an email filter John, I think you'll find that most of the posts you send , or those that simply make mention of you (like this one), will find it's way into more and more trash cans. You're correspondence technique, has left a bitter taste in many peoples mouths. Because of it, anything you say, no matter how technically accurate or valid, will simply be ignored & disregarded. And this has nothing to do with being abusive or name calling. When someone states an opinion, or a preference, and you reply by saying "WRONG, WRONG, WRONG", it's you who comes across as unpleasant. Opinions & personal preferences in particular, can't be wrong, they just are. It's a shame really, you seem like a smart guy. It's just you appear to be unable to play nicely with others. Cheers & Happy Holidays, Dave At 10:44 AM 19/12/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote: >Secondly, if someone wants to comment on my latest posts, >I suggest they be able to read them and then read them first. Its not >very smart to say you have had it with me, will not read any of my >posts, and then proceed to continue >posting new stuff related to me and my posts speculating on what I "may" >or "may not" >have just posted recently isnt it? I think someone should either read >my new posts or just shut up about them and me completely. To continue >posting >about them, while not actually reading them, makes no sense whatsoever. >This is one of the reasons I havent ever filtered anyone in my life. >If you filter them out, you really have no business commenting later >because you are totally in the dark with regards to what has been >discussed. >jco -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
