I have to admit that I sympathize with your position on this. I'm very fond of HDTV. My Pioneer HD is a 61 inch plasma. Prior to that I had a 60-inch rear-projection analog Magnavox, which died after fourteen years. The Pioneer HDTV was double the cost of the analog Magnavox. Allowing for inflation, it was probably about 1.6 times as much. But that's picking nits. I like it. On the other hand, I don't care if anyone else likes it, and I won't debate the issue. Doesn't matter. (BTW, it's awesome for jpeg slide shows.) Paul On Dec 19, 2006, at 7:40 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Exactly, I am forced to repeat myself over > and over a over again by arguments that > ignore what I have already stated. This was > in repsonse to his 2-3X "cost factor" > comments....These larger HD sets do > not cost 2-3X the price of the large > ntsc sets ( which are not even availble > any more, all have been discontinued, the image > quality is just so poor compared to HD > at that size). > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > Paul Stenquist > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 6:50 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Please everyone set up an email filter > > > > On Dec 19, 2006, at 6:30 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > >> I have already >> stated this about 10 times, > > That says it all, doesn't it? > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
