I hate to say it but GRAYWOLF is sorta busted and my statements on that topic were not wrong at all. That set clearly is stamped 1989 and he initally claimed it was from 1983. I told you all that in 1983 you couldnt get any sets with video inputs on them except on top line Sony and I stated that the set most likely did not have any video inputs or was made at a later date, and there it is folks " 1 9 8 9 " stamped right on it not 1983 as initially reported and discussed and being told wrong by him when there is nothing wrong with what I said at all. Maybe we had a mixup on the date, I dont recall 1989 ever being mentioned, only 1983, but I stated 1983 in my reply posts and he didnt correct the discussion to 1989 like he should have. Six years makes a on what a set could have and couldnt have as far as features.
P.S. I get a big kick out of the air/circuitry ratio on the rear view shot! Unbelieveable. jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Maas Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 9:21 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The cause of the controversy graywolf wrote: > http://www.graywolfphoto.com/digital/TV.html > Looks like a nice unit. I miss those console TV's, you don't need a TV stand with them. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
