On Dec 20, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: >> A pity. My only interest in 35mm film would be for the Hasselblad >> XPan, which I would think would be a natural for your panorama >> interests. > > I skimmed through your B&W workflow and immediately saw the light. I > just placed an order for more Tri-X.
So what did you mean to imply by that? If you meant that it looked like a lot of work ... The B&W workflow I listed generally takes about 2-3 minutes per photo to complete once you understand what you're doing (I have it about 80% scripted and can process 1000 RAW files to a default B&W rendering in about half the time it takes to process one roll of negatives), and you have more options to start with. It's much more difficult and more time consuming to process and print a roll of B&W film to equal quality standards. G -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
