Har.

Tom C wrote:
> Well let's just speculate that Pentax does produce a FF body.  That does not 
> necessarily mean that APS size lenses go down the tubes does it?  The camera 
> could sense or one could set a switch indicating that a smaller format lens 
> is being used, and the resulting raw or .jpg file would not show any 
> vignetting.
>
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>   
>> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Dpreview's D200 jpeg overall conclusion: same problem 
>> different
>> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:37:32 -0500
>>
>> Who says that Pentax can't have two different format "miniature" format
>> DSLRs, or you'll just have to suck it up and eventually replace all
>> those DA lenses while the APS sensor DSLR are phased out.  Pentax gets
>> more profits from lens sales and can stay in business and create more
>> new products.
>>
>> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>     
>>> I'm still not buying it. Too many DA lenses popping up. No DFA lenses
>>> other than long glass. And APS-C sensor technology will undoubtedly
>>> progress. Add to this the bad angles you encounter using full frame
>>> with the Pentax K mount and the forthcoming 645D, and I'm betting no
>>> full frame DSLR from Pentax. But we'll see. I will be pleased if they
>>> do make one. More choices are a good thing.
>>> Paul
>>> On Dec 20, 2006, at 4:21 PM, Tom C wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hey.... I thought that's what myself, Rob Studdert, P.J. have been
>>>> saying
>>>> for several years now, followed by loud boos and hisses about how the
>>>> industry has abandoned the 135 format....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tom C.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Dpreview's D200 jpeg overall conclusion: same problem
>>>>> different
>>>>> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:43:53 -0500 (EST)
>>>>>
>>>>> Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Actually my quite reliable sources told me that next semi-pro body
>>>>>> from Sony will have FF sensor and it will be priced well below
>>>>>> Canon 5D.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Not surprising (well, maybe the price part is!), especially since
>>>>> Sony
>>>>> makes their own sensors.
>>>>>
>>>>> As the pixel-count wars show no signs of abating and noise
>>>>> performance
>>>>> at ISO 1600 and up is a hot topic, manufacturers will have no choice
>>>>> but to increase sensor size on their top models in the future as they
>>>>> go beyond 10-12 megapixels.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
>>                      --Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>     
>
>
>
>   


-- 
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
                        --Albert Einstein



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to