Actually, mean thickness is closer to a nautic mile than an English mile.
Source:
http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/Resources/schoolzone/resources/Factsheets/factsheet_geostats_print.pdf

On 12/27/06, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some of the ice seems to be melting, some of it seems to be getting
> thicker. I have found nothing to confirm that the ice cap averages over
> a mile. I do know that it is over a mile think in some places, but that
> is hardly an average. Any realistic information I have found about the
> ice caps overall melting faster than normal can be translated to "Who
> knows?". Remember where the ice caps extended to 10-20 thousand years
> ago; whoops, who can remember that far back?
>
> And interesting, but related, aside: We think of forests as resources
> and recreational areas. To prehistoric (before metal tools) man they
> were a real threat slowly encroaching upon their tiny fields and their
> hunting areas driving them into the recently melted glacial tundras
> along with the game they depended upon. For many thousands of years
> mankind was caught between the retreating glaciers and the advancing
> forests. The evil forest of folktale was very real. And that long slow
> war may be the cause of the rise of modern man as the dominant species.
>
>
>
> John Francis wrote:
>
> > The problem comes with the Antarctic ice sheets (and, to a small extent,
> > glaciers and snow/ice cover in other parts of the world).  The average
> > thickness of the Antarctic ice is well over a mile.  Even the smaller
> > West Antarctic ice sheet contains enough ice to raise mean sea level
> > by 20 feet.  The larger East Antarctic sheet contains an order of
> > magnitude more ice - enough to raise sea levels by over 150 feet!
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to