Actually, you have to ask how much it costs governmentally to produce
the batteries in the first place. If you're going to do that math to
start with that is.
Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>> On 12/27/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Developing sustainable low or non-polluting energy sources enabling travel
>>> is preferable to not going anywhere, or making everyone live within
>>> people-power distance from their employment.
>>>
>> I agree that non-polluting energy sources are preferable, but I'd
>> advocate shorter distance from home to work for a far more practical
>> reason; traffic jam. :-)
>>
>
> Shame on you ;-). Shite - I still will have to do my morning jam routine
> today. By the way, in the office they agreed that I'd work from home
> up until jam is over and only then arrive. It makes my air somewhat
> fresher everyday ;-).
>
> As usual, gentlemen, one has to take into account the pollution that has
> to be produced in order to produce these so called non-polluting energy
> sources. Take for example hybrid cars. I am afraid that if all these
> batteries it carries are disposed improperly - much damage will be done
> to the good old Mother Earth.
>
> However the doomsday will come anyway, regardless ;-).
>
> Boris
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
