If you won't to debate my personal habits, why don't pick something more
important like the use of my car? 

I believe I know the answer to my question. 


Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: 29. desember 2006 04:49
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Doomsday is coming upon us?

I would guess that one smoker contributes very little to the  
generation of CO2. On the other hand, I would expect that millions or  
maybe even  billions of smokers burning tobacco leaves all day long  
are a substantial part of the problem. I'm sure it should be part of  
this thread. Why wouldn't it be?
Paul
On Dec 28, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:

> To put it simple (I like it simple). Smoking is plain stupidity.
> There many reasons why it is stupid. My personal life span is one  
> example.
> You have listed several others.
>
> It is also an environmental problem. But not because of global  
> heating. The
> impact on global heating is similar to the impact of a mouse fart. The
> environmental problem is in pesticides used when growing the  
> tobacco. The
> other problem is all the chemicals used in making the end product.  
> But those
> chemicals have no known impact on global heating.
>
> As I said. Bash on. I don't feel uncomfortable with it at all. But  
> please do
> it in a thread unrelated to the global heating issue.
> Title the thread Tim is a liar and thief if you want to ;-)
>
>
> Tim
> Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On  
> Behalf Of Tom
> C
> Sent: 29. desember 2006 02:22
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: Doomsday is coming upon us?
>
>> Aren't we going OT now?
>>
>> I have an urge to say that I don't feel that my smoking habits are  
>> the real
>> issue. To me, this seems like a smokescreen (pun intended)  
>> cowering the
>> real
>> debate.
>>
>> But by all means, bash on if you feel uncomfortable debating.
>>
>>
>> Tim
>
> How can you go OT on an OT? :-)
>
> Actually I think Bill's point is relevant. Why? Because we tend to  
> view our
> own behavior as acceptable and normal and expect others to do the  
> changing.
>
> However when the finger points back at us, we're uncomfortable.
>
> While little old you smoking X cigarettes a day may have a  
> negligible effect
>
> on pollution on a global scale (just like other single persons  
> taking long
> showers or driving gas-guzzling SUV's), it has a much larger effect  
> when we
> shrink the picture down a little or when we look at the cumulative  
> effect.
>
> Your behavior is clearly dichotomous...  Wanting to save the planet  
> while at
>
> the same time almost assuredly shortening the time span of your  
> existence on
>
> it, both lessening your time to enjoy it and the time you might  
> have to make
>
> a difference.
>
> The cost in health care and missed productivity due to smoking related
> ailments is huge. Next calculate how much time and energy (human  
> and fossil
> fuel) is wasted annually in an industry that essentially provides a  
> delivery
>
> method for a drug that induces a slow suicide. Then there's the  
> smoking
> mothers whose babies may have future health issues and possible  
> lower IQ's,
> putting a bigger drain on health care and education systems.
>
> I'm not bashing you.  I'm not criticizing you. You work in the social
> welfare field though and are sure aware of the implications of one's
> personal behavior. OK, I just had to get that little one in. :-)
>
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>> On 12/28/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Tim Øsleby" Subject: RE: Doomsday is coming upon us?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Agreed. That's why I smoke outside rain or cold. You could argue
>>>>> that I
>>>>> pollute the environment. That's true, but I don't think it is
>>>>> significant.
>>>>
>>>> Tim, this is pretty much the argument that you have been on the
>>>> other side
>>>> of.
>>>> No one person makes a significant impact, so why should any one
>>>> person
>>>> change their habits, be it driving a large vehicle, taking long
>>>> hot showers
>>>> or whatever else they do that is environmentally harmful?
>>>>
>>>> William Robb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>> DagT
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to