I gather the 1600 ISO is the third shot down? Nice image and, at a quick glance, the sharpest of the group. Likely a faster shutter.(?)
Jack --- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While the fellas were out for their evening constitutional, I looked > at the > heavens and saw a very clear sky with the moon in a location that I > could > take pictures of it easily. > So, I set up the rig again, and went about photographing it again. > This time, I set the focus most carefully, and used a cable release > on the > camera, along with the 3 second delay. > Then, I decided to ramp up the ISO to see if I could get some noise. > There are three shots of the moon on this page, the top was shot at > ISO 100, > the middle at ISO 400, the bottom was shot at ISO 1600. > Again, this series was shot with the A600/5.6 with the 2XL converter > mounted. I attempted to process each file as close to identically as > I > could, though I gave the ISO 1600 file less sharpening as it was > showing > noise at that point. > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/moon/moons.html > > Anyway, as a technical experiment, it seems successful, as a > photograph, the > subject line says it all. > > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
