But on --manual focus-- lenses like the K/M/A which was the original comparison, the build quality effects the ease of use because its easier to manual focus a really well made lens then an el crapo. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 3:06 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: FS: Pentax SMC-A 35mm f/2 True ... but then again, I'd be looking more for convenience and ease of use on the DSLR rather than ultimate build quality. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Gonz > Certainly the FA35/2 is a very attractive lens, on many fronts. Its > not > as well built however, but then again how many lenses today are built > like the old K's? > > rg > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Yes, I understand about the GB Kludge. I have, and am happy with, > > the K35/2.0, however, the convenience and features of the A lens has > > led me to > > ask the question. If the A isn't markedly superior to the K, then > > I'd not > > be too interested in it, and would ultimately consider an FA35/2.0. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
