I've been calibrating to gamma 1.8, although I have profiles for gamma 2.2 as well. I find that gamma 1.8 gives more consistent rendering quality between print and screen when doing B&W, for color work the difference seems insignificant.
G On Jan 12, 2007, at 6:44 PM, David J Brooks wrote: > Good to hear. > > I have the Spyder 1? bought from MR, and i, being a real chicken have > yet to install this, as, basically, i'm afraid i'll screw somthing up. > > Words like this will help me over the hump and Spyder my Viewsonic and > get my 2400 printing. > > :-) > > Dave > > Quoting Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I run Gamma 2.2 on my Mac with Apple cinema display. The monitor is >> calibrated with a Spyder 2. My new Epson R2400 duplicates the screen >> image flawlessly as did my previous Epson 2200. I don't see that >> there's anything to be gained using G 1.8. >> Paul -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
