God, lots of typos. Hope everyone can read it(-:. Sorry, Paul On Jan 13, 2007, at 11:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> My system is basically a two-part thing. I have a 1550 Pelican, which > can hold two cameras 14 lenses (including an A 400/5.6, quite a few > memory cards, a dozen filters or so, two spare camera battekes for > the Kw0 and a set of 8 lithiums for the D, various lens cleaning > accessories, camera manuals, and a pair of glasses. I also have a > Lowenpro Orion bag that can be belted around the waste or slung over > the shoulder. I have no idea what model number it is. I don't worry > about such things, and it's not marked. (I only know the model number > of the Pelican because it's marked and I just looked.) In any case, > the Orion bag can hold a camera with a lens mlounted, three > additional short to medium lenses and a few cards and batteries. I > need nothing more than these two storage systems.I can't imagine that > I would ever waste more money on other storage systems. > Paul > On Jan 13, 2007, at 11:32 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >> Ok. Yes: $280 for that thing would be silly IMO. >> >> The Kata Sensitivity-V is indeed a pretty slim, small-kit carrier, >> not intended for a kit which includes large lenses. That fits my >> style of shooting well: I only rarely carry more than two or three >> lenses and most of the time they're all primes in the 14 to 70 mm >> range, which are very compact. >> >> Godfrey >> >> On Jan 13, 2007, at 7:57 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote: >> >>> Sorry. Should have been clearer. I was referring to the Tinktank, >>> street >>> price 280USD. The Kata seem a bit small for my use. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
