The card won't hurt the camera. I doubt that it can take advantage of any card faster then the 133x Sandisk. Paul On Jan 14, 2007, at 12:08 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Pauln and others, > >> I've become more skeptical of off-brand cards with the K10D. I never >> had a problem with CF cards in the *istD, using a number of low buck >> cards. With the K10D and SD cards, I had an early failure with a >> Transcend 2 gig, 150X card, and Boris seems to be having some >> problems with another bargain brand. I'm going to stick to Sandisk or >> Lexar for now. I just ordered a two gig Sandixk to replace my failed >> Transcend. It was only $77 from Amazon. Not as cheap as a Trascend >> from New Egg, but still quite reasonable. (Plus I had a $50 gift >> certificate at Amazon from the parents of the groom, whose wedding I >> shot for nix. ) There are probably even some better deals out there >> on the Sandisk cards. > > You see, I have opted to buy an off-brand card because we don't > seem to > have 150x brand name cards here. The fastest SanDisk we have is 133x. > And since Godfrey (just a reference, no offense, pun or anything > but the > reference intended) reported that K10D was very fast with the cards, I > decided to try to buy the fastest I could. I may have made a wrong > decision. I only do hope that this card cannot break the card port of > the camera. > > Boris > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
