Howdy all! I've tried Photoshop CS2 today to develop some RAW files and the results were (probably as expected) the best so far. While smoothness remained about the same as with SilkyPix (very positive), Camera RAW extracted a tad more information. Even better thing is, that it doesn't really matter - as long as one keeps the RAW files there'll always be a possibility of improvements within a RAW software (I like it, it's the same as with film scanning - you keep the originals and as technology of scanning improves so do your scans). That said, I am quite satisfied with results from each software I've tried, even the basic automatic conversion with Picasa is good enough for me now. Should I change my opinion I can always redo the pictures using another software. Let's talk about peace of mind... :-)
Well, I must admit I didn't expect such a big difference between digital compacts and DSLRs. I can only hope that difference between istDs and K10D is somewhat smaller, because otherwise it'll ruin my bank account. Can somebody please tell me it's negligible? ;-) Cheers, Peter -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
