Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> 
> 
> So, how do you get a more selective DOF?  What if you want just a
> small area in focus and lots of out of focus area in front of or
> behind the subject?  Can you set the focus between two subjects, where

and Alin said:

>   Bokeh? What bokeh can you possibly get at such high dof? Really,
>   I thought the limited series defined bokeh here. Now we're supposed
>   to give up to this and other insignificant features like sharpness,
>   resolution, just for the sake of convenience. Frankly, I don't see
>   anything else in your argumentation besides it's so easy.

It seems to me that a lot of these questions have to do with the
*particular* camera Mike has. Those questions are valid, but possibly
irrelevant in light of the fact that soon you'll be able to mount all
your Pentax lenses on an MZ-D. You'll be able to manually focus and
expose to your heart's content.

The interesting aspect of Mike's post is that he's an avowed and
accomplished darkroom freak who really seems to like the output he gets
from a middle of the road digital camera.

It's quite surprising and should give you pause to think. An *average*
digital p+s has the former editor of Darkroom Techniques gushing over
PRINT QUALITY.

A year ago I wouldn't have believed it possible.

Again, the proof is in the prints.

tv  (who will quite happily spend 4 hours in the darkroom tonight making
fiber 11x14's)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to