The original D has better build quality than any of its siblings, and it can be fitted with a battery grip. Functionally, The DS2 is the best. Aestetically, i'd say that the D is the best. All of them work very well.
-------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > So what you are saying is the DS2 is the best of > all the pre-K series Pentax DSLR models in all respects? > Or are there somethings it's lacking compared to an original D? > thanks, > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Mat Maessen > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:01 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2? > > > On 1/26/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is the DS2 better or worse than the DS > > or D and in what way? > > The DS2 has a larger LCD screen than the DS. It also incorporated the > change including AF-continuous mode from the DS version 2.0 software > into its 1.0 software. So if you have a DS with version 2.0 or later > software on it, it is functionally identical to a DS2. I bought a DS2 > because it came along at the right time, at the right price. > > Both the DS and DS2 have faster card write speeds than the original D. > The viewfinders are identical to the D, and can have their focusing > screens changed relatively easily. > > -Mat > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
