Cory Papenfuss wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Stan Halpin wrote: > >> Not based on personal experience, but the general consensus is that the >> primary shortcomings of the *ist-D compared to the more refined later >> D-series brethren are the D's smaller, slower, write buffer and its >> smaller LCD. I was thoroughly pleased with the D, not at all tempted by >> the follow-ons, and moved to the K10D primarily to get the >> shake-reduction feature. I really like the vertical grip available on >> the -D and K10D and would miss that on any of the others. >> >> Stan >> > The DS has the same LCD as the D, no? I've been pleased with > mine, but the later larger LCDs (in the DL and the DS2) are definately > nicer. ANY of them are nicer than the absolutely hideous LCD in the Canon > Rebel and Rebel XT. > > Another factor is longevity in memory cards. Granted they're not > that much anymore, but Pentax has clearly implied they're going SD. > > -Cory >
No, the DS has a 2" LCD, the D a 1.8" and all others are 2.5" -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
