Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:36 AM, John Whittingham wrote: > >> I bought it for use on the MZ-3, I really liked the build and bright >> viewfinder image it afforded. The Smegma does have the advantage of >> diminutive size and light weight and I love the dedicated hood but >> wish it >> was reversible. Here's a shot with the Smegma on the old MX from >> about 1985: >> >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5422977 > > Nice shot ... > > Hard to say much about any lens from a low-rez web photo, but it > looks like it does ok. I don't usually buy Sigma lenses because the > experiences I've had with Sigma equipment have not been positive. > > Godfrey >
Sigma's are decent enough as long as they don't have electronics. If they do, then worry. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
