John Francis wrote: > Don't you believe it. Note that this was a 120-300/f2.8, not f/4. > It would probably weigh about as much as all the lenses you list.
Well, since it would displace the 200/2.8 and 300/4.5, and get me to f/2.8 for focal lengths I don't currently have it, I'd probably put up with it. I was willing to put up with the 80-200/2.8 on film ... -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
