Thanks Marnie, I hadn' t done any sharpening in the 1st version. Processing on Photoshop Elements 5.0 has me put off a bit. I really prefered Paint Shop Pro and the controls are different, and the upgrade from 4.0 to 5.0 is a bit wierd for me. I had trouble finding unsharp mask, then questioned where to set it. Regards, Bob S.
On 2/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 2/3/2007 11:05:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Thanks Godfrey, Paul, David S, Jack D, Tim, Marnie, and Boris for > looking and the comments. I was wondering about the sharpness of the > photo as it was taken with the FA28 at f6.7 and should be pretty > sharp. I went back and put a sharpened version out there, as I seemed > to have forgotten to use any unsharp mask with the K10D. I also made a > crop to 100% pixel size and gave it some unsharp mask also. (60%, > radius 5, threshold 5 on both) > > Let me know if this is any better as sharpened and sent to Picasa, and > if you think I'm getting a sharp enough original to begin with. > > http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/Peso > > Regards, Bob S. > > =========== > It looks better sharpened. And I think that is all it was, not foggy glass > or anything. However, having said all that, I am not sure I would sharpen it > as much as you have. It didn't look bad a little soft. I think, if it was me, > I'd sharpen somewhere in between the original and second verison. > > HTH, Marnie aka Doe > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
