Maybe you should have your camera checked out, David. I find that noise at 1600 with my K10D is quite minimal, less than with my *istD. This is shot at 1600, and it's cropped to about 60%. No noise reduction. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5247870&size=lg Paul
> On 06/02/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> What has film got to do with the K10D's lack of ISO 3200? >> >> I can appreciate that in certain situations the advantages of having >> ISO >> 3200 available outweigh it's disadvantages. >> >> I've taken very usable & printable ISO 1600/3200 shots with the *istD >> (after some creative use of noise reduction) & I've taken pictures at >> ISO >> 1600 on the K10D that no amount of noise reduction could help. >> >> Different strokes & all that. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
