Paul, I suggest each time you describe the way you took a shot you insert a word "steady" somewhere ;-).
On 2/6/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks. Maybe they're underexposed a bit? This shot was taken in very > dim light. Just a bit of room tungsten lighting at night. But it's > right on with exposure. I think it was something like f2 @ 1/8th second. > On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:47 AM, David Savage wrote: > > > Sweet shot Paul. > > > > I admit, I have got good results at 1600 with the K10D in decent > > light. But in really poor light the shots I have are quite noisy. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dave > > > > On 2/6/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Maybe you should have your camera checked out, David. I find that > >> noise > >> at 1600 with my K10D is quite minimal, less than with my *istD. > >> This is > >> shot at 1600, and it's cropped to about 60%. No noise reduction. > >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5247870&size=lg > >> Paul > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
