Yes, that would be in line with modern times... On 2/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about "Shake Reduction?" :-) > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Paul, I suggest each time you describe the way you took a shot you > > insert a word "steady" somewhere ;-). > > > > On 2/6/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks. Maybe they're underexposed a bit? This shot was taken in very > > > dim light. Just a bit of room tungsten lighting at night. But it's > > > right on with exposure. I think it was something like f2 @ 1/8th second. > > > On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:47 AM, David Savage wrote: > > > > > > > Sweet shot Paul. > > > > > > > > I admit, I have got good results at 1600 with the K10D in decent > > > > light. But in really poor light the shots I have are quite noisy. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > On 2/6/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Maybe you should have your camera checked out, David. I find that > > > >> noise > > > >> at 1600 with my K10D is quite minimal, less than with my *istD. > > > >> This is > > > >> shot at 1600, and it's cropped to about 60%. No noise reduction. > > > >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5247870&size=lg > > > >> Paul > > > > > > > > -- > > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > [email protected] > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > -- > > Boris > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
