On Feb 9, 2007, at 12:51, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > On 2/7/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I shot a roll of Kodak Plus-X in the 645 at GFM last June. Scott >> Loveless actually souped the stuff for me on site but I didn't get >> around to scanning them until a couple of weeks ago. No real >> standouts >> amongst them but a few that aren't bad. Here are four shots: >> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/gfmbw/ > > Hmm. I just got the moment to look at these. > > Either the downsampled rendering has destroyed most of the tonalities > or our monitors are set too differently. They look oversharpened to > me, and the contrast curves look too steep, most of the Zone III-V > tones are missing or muddy. >
This was my impression as well. I wondered if maybe my first viewing had been in a bad lighting situation, so I didn't say anything. Almost Tri-X-like in the sharp harsh contrast.... -Charles -- Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
