K.Takeshita wrote: > On 2/11/07 12:18 PM, "P. J. Alling", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> You have more faith in the perfectibility of LCD's than I do. > > Yes, I do. New EVFs are already in existence in several incarnations, > including the use of organic LED. It is a matter of who have courage to get > out of the mold first. > But I would not be interested in them unless it has acceptable resolution > and fast enough refreshing rate. > I am sure and it's industry's prediction that perfect EVF will come sooner > than later, whether we like it or not. > BTW, Oly are said to have developed a dual viewfinder (optical and EVF). > > Let's ee how things will change and evolve :-). > > Ken >
The real issue with EVF's isn't resolution or refresh rate. Those are both merely engineering issues. The real issue is lag. EVF's are inherently laggy. Optical viewfinders inherently aren't. I see EVF SLR-type bodies being successful on the low-end of the DSLR market. But the lag issue will kill them on the pro and semi-pro markets (The former because it causes problems, the latter because of the former). -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
