On 2/11/07 1:26 PM, "K.Takeshita", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even if the EVF is just "near perfect" at this point, but the elimination of > return-mirror would give us more benefits, I would seriously consider and > embrace it. Development of finders alternative to optical one seems to be a > tide. Hey, don't you think Canon have more reason to go for an alternative viewfinder if it gives users (particularly of entry to medium bodies) so much better alternative in terms of large view and brightness etc instead of dark tunnel vision ? :-). They might be the first one to go for it. 4/3 group will have similar reason due to poor viewfinder because of the nature of smaller size sensor. You never know :-). Let's see what might come out in PMA. Ken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
