The new version is much better. It says more. Overall, I'd call it a good people shot. It raises questions. Something is happening. That makes it worthwhile. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Based on several comments, I have done a little bit of change to the > shot. Along with which version you prefer, I would still wonder > generally about the shot - is it worth the bother and effort beyond a > learning exercise? > > New version: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4294a.htm > > Original version: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4294.htm > > -- > Thanks, > > Bruce > > > Tuesday, February 13, 2007, 9:56:30 AM, you wrote: > > pcn> I find it interesting. There's activity that invokes ideas. > pcn> It's sharp and well detailed. Nicely composed. You might try a > pcn> slightly tighter crop that eliminates open area on the right and > pcn> above the figures. I think that if the people were postiioned > pcn> more to the right of frame, the "over there" concept might come > pcn> through more powerfully. > pcn> Paul > pcn> -------------- Original message ---------------------- > pcn> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> I am quite undecided on this shot. I wanted to post it here to see > >> what you all think of it. > >> > >> Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X 400/5.6, Handheld > >> ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/8 > >> > >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4294.htm > >> > >> Comments welcomed > >> > >> -- > >> Bruce > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
