LOL... seriously though (seriously?) one could set up four walls as an 
exhibit and allow people to walk into the room/rooms. :-)



Tom C.


>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 06 - GDG
>Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:33:39 +0000
>
>A bit uncomfortable and short on storage space:-).
>Paul
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
>From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The photo just gave me an idea for a project, probably already been 
>tried.
> > What if one were to decorate/furnish a house or apartment with life-size
> > photos of the objects as opposed to the objects themselves?
> >
> > You kitchen cabinet is a start.  Photos would be displayed in the normal
> > position and expected orientation of the the object.  A sofa photograph
> > would be put on the wall where the sofa goes, whereas a coffee table 
>photo
> > in front of it would lay flat on the floor.
> >
> > Kind of a weird 2-D interior.
> >
> >
> > Tom C.
> >
> >
> > >From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> > >To: DUG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, PDML List 
><[email protected]>,PAW
> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, SeePhoto Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 06 - GDG
> > >Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:00:14 -0800
> > >
> > >Thanks for all the comments!
> > >
> > >Godfrey
> > >
> > >
> > > >> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/06.htm
> > >
> > >From: Mark Pope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > that's a lovely shot.  I think you've succeeded in making both a
> > > > beautiful and serene image.  Interestingly, if the silvery
> > > > thingummyjig is taken out of the shot, it doesn't work.
> > >
> > >From: Chris Saganich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > I'm not familiar with Sugimoto's work but I like your emulation.
> > > > My only criticism has to do with geometry.  A more centered
> > > > approach  INMHO would increase the effect.  And perhaps a touch
> > > > lighter?
> > >
> > >From: Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Interesting, Godfrey, but it needs more playing with,
> > > > methinks.  More contrast, maybe; some more distinct
> > > > shadows; some cropping?
> > >
> > >From: ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Hmmm - give the sort of thing you are going for here (I think:) )
> > > > I'd go
> > > > for absolutely centering the cabinet
> > > > from top to bottom.  Also, I found the little dab of paint above the
> > > > left knob on cabinet distracting - but I guess
> > > > it would be "cheating" to clone it out  - and then it wouldn't be as
> > > > much what it is as it is.
> > > > (huh? whaddid she say???)
> > >
> > >From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Close. I find it intriguing and well rendered. I wonder if it 
>wouldn't
> > > > be better with most of the left door and much of the empt area at 
>top
> > > > cropped out. That would bring the shadow play more center stage, so 
>to
> > > > speak.
> > >
> > >From: Paul Dunderdale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Beautiful simplicity, but maybe a bit busy compared with - say -
> > > > the 'Caribbean Sea', or 'Pacific Ocean'....  ;-)
> > > > Nice work, Godfrey.  Sparse Compositions 2 on the way?
> > > > Thanks for the heads-up on Sugimoto - http://www.hirshhorn.si.edu/
> > > > sugimoto/photography.htm gives a lot of pause for thought.
> > >
> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > I get what you going  for, but it doesn't ring my chimes. I find it
> > > > too
> > > > symmetrical, and I think it  needs something more than the shiny
> > > > cup on top, that
> > > > one can barely see, as a  center of interest.
> > > >
> > > > Uh, can I be that honest?
> > >
> > >From: Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Like a three chord rock song, simple but appealling.
> > > > Three shades of grey.
> > >
> > >From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Well, it may be bald faced or even bold faced, but rather like it.
> > > > Nice shot and rendering!
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >[email protected]
> > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to