The Trinitron system used RCA's improved electron gun design and masking 
technology which made the one gun Color Tube possible.

J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> I dont follow that, the uniqueness of the
> trinitron was it was a one gun system for
> color which usually used three guns. A one
> gun monochrome CRT was already standard.
> Can you elusidate further?
> jco
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> P. J. Alling
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 9:01 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: 85mm f1.8 SMCT on ebay : $400+
>
>
> Trinitron was based on RCA patents for a superior B&W set.  RCA of 
> course didn't see any need to have a better set and sold them to Sony.  
> The rest is history.
>
> Cory Papenfuss wrote:
>   
>>      I'm jumping in a bit late on this, but I've got a couple of
>> comments about my opinion of Sony
>>   
>>     
>>> Re Sony, they are a respectable company and noone has any doubt about
>>>       
>
>   
>>> it. But since the overhaul of thier executive structures, it has been
>>>       
>
>   
>>> a known fact that they have been struggling and stumbling in consumer
>>>       
>
>   
>>> electronic market.
>>>     
>>>       
>>      Margins too low anymore.  They've had to cheapify consumer stuff
>> for the past 20 years.  At least in their home theater stuff
>>     
> (receivers, 
>   
>> amps, DVD players, VCR's), quality is the same or worse as any other 
>> cheepie no-name brand... only more expensive because it's a "Sony."
>>     
> One 
>   
>> of their last great innovations that actually succeeded (IMO) was 
>> Trinitron.  They were without question the best available CRTs for
>>     
> dozens 
>   
>> of years.  Most other innovations are me-too's, together with a HUGE
>>     
> smack 
>   
>> of arrogance and proprietary stuff (think mini-disc and memory stick).
>>
>>   It became a known patter recently that they search for what they
>>   
>>     
>>> perceive to be profitable market, explore them, but if they found 
>>> they are not for them, they are too quick to fold up.  It was not 
>>> like that before. Look at Cleo (or whatever is called, a Palm PDA) 
>>> from which they retreated. Their portable audio is overwhelmed by 
>>> iPod, and much touted Play Station stuff is now seem to be in limbo. 
>>> Theyb are still a king in the institutional market.  They have been 
>>> producing great imaging products.  But they are operating like a fire
>>>       
>
>   
>>> drill and still seraching for the directions and goals in "consumer 
>>> electronics" area. Those are the facts which is substantiated by 
>>> CFO's uttering.
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>      I'm pretty sure that in their professional gear, the quality is
>> still there.  Of course the prices are higher and the margins are
>>     
> fatter. 
>   
>> At least if you buy a professional-grade Sony product though, you get
>>     
> what 
>   
>> you pay for.
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> I wish they did not have a propriatary hot shoe.... :-).
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>      See above about Sony's love of proprietary sh*t.
>>
>> -Cory
>> <\rant_mode>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
--

The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
                        -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to