OK, but why then taking efforts to produce DFA 50 and 100 Macro? Weird. And BTW, if what and the pics stays as it is, the 55 for 645 is not marketed as DFA but as DFA645 (well that's what's written on it).
So DFA would go the way of the dodo just FAJ? Time will tell. 2007/2/24, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That message was already sent loud and clear with DA lenses replacing > the out of production FA lenses. > Paul > On Feb 24, 2007, at 5:38 AM, Thibouille wrote: > > > Yeah they might but I still find that a bit strange (not that it is > > unusual for Pentax). > > They did introduced DFA and DFA serie is (was?) supposed to have a > > clear caracteristics... > > Might indeed be a message: No FF. > > > > 2007/2/24, K.Takeshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> On 2/23/07 8:10 PM, "Mark Roberts", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> I have heard that this is nothing more than a change in nomenclature, > >>> not in the coverage area of the lens. > >> > >> I am not aware of change in nomenclature but you might know something > >> we > >> don't. At these FLs, there is no reason to deliberately make the > >> image > >> circle smaller for the telecentric reason. So, they may have unified > >> the > >> nomenclature simply as Digital Auto. I might be able to find out. > >> > >> Ken > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > > > > > > -- > > Thibault Massart aka Thibouille > > ---------------------- > > K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
