If history is any indication, Pentax will be right up front in build quality. Compare the K10D to similar priced Canons. "Nuff said. Paul On Feb 25, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 25/2/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> I don't know if they'll hit that price but if they can get anywhere >> near that of the high-megapixel Canons they'll have a winner. > > That IMO depends on a lot of things (I'm thinking noise, build quality > for starters). No good having a cost-effective camera if it doesn't > deliver the goods in terms of picture quality (and I have no reason to > think it won't) or professional handling. Pentax need pros buying this > camera, and if they pick it up and find that it looks as if there has > been cost-cutting on the build, they'll put it down again. I really > hope > it has had the works WRT quality where it counts. If not, then it will > appeal less to those who need it, and more to those who want it. > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > _____________________________ > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
