Only temporarily, to take some more pictures.
> 
> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/02/26 Mon PM 02:09:32 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Ah ... a new lens
> 
> Shall I throw myself out of this one, Mister Wilson? ;-)
> 
> Boris
> 
> On 2/26/07, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: 2007/02/26 Mon AM 08:57:43 GMT
> > > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: Ah ... a new lens
> > >
> > > No, Mike, I just chose to report few lenses that I use most according
> > > to this statistic. At least 2,000 shots were made with K and KA mount
> > > lenses that do not transmit full lens information, and of course there
> > > is at least 5-7 more lenses that score generally less than those I
> > > mentioned. Please rest assured that I don't forget to mount the lens
> > > and don't forget to take the cap off the lens ;-), unlike certain
> > > politicians and their binoculars.
> >
> > Ooooh, politics!  That would get you thrown off a few lists....
> >
> > 8-)))
> >
> > >
> > > On 2/26/07, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Date: 2007/02/26 Mon AM 05:24:23 GMT
> > > > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> > > > > Subject: Re: Ah ... a new lens
> > > > >
> > > > > Godfrey, I do enjoy our conversation about this lens. I've just 
> > > > > clicked
> > > > > on some button (I am still quite a kludge in LR 1.0 that I downloaded
> > > > > for a trial) and the statistics of which lenses I used how many times
> > > > > showed.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, for roughly 9,000 images I shot with *istD and K10D the 
> > > > > distribution
> > > > > is as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > > 77 lim - 1079
> > > > > 43 lim - 607
> > > > > 31 lim - 579
> > > > > Tamron 28-75/2.8 - 791
> > > >
> > > > You shot a lot of pictures with no lens.  Or was it lenses that do not 
> > > > transmit information?
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I am fascinated, 'cause I never thought of my shooting habits in these
> > > > > terms...
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, it appears that limited lenses get their limited use ;-).
> > > > >
> > > > > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> > > > > > Here's a rather extreme demonstration of flare with the FA31:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    http://homepage.mac.com/godders/FA31-flare.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > Extreme indeed.
> > > > >
> > > > > > A good lens hood would likely eliminate it for the DSLR, if you 
> > > > > > could
> > > > > > fit a good lens hood with that fixed hood. Grr.
> > > > >
> > > > > I totally agree.
> > > > >
> > > > > > For me, the 43 Limited is going to replace the 35/2 and 50/1.4 ... 
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > slots in between the 28 and 70 perfectly. The kit I've assembled  
> > > > > > now
> > > > > > is very complete, for my purposes: DA14, DA21, FA28, FA43, DA70 and
> > > > > > the DA50-200. All (except the 14) very compact and light, just the
> > > > > > right FoV coverage, very high image quality throughout. The graph of
> > > > > > FoV vs FL is pretty nice:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    http://homepage.mac.com/godders/FoVs-Pentax-DSLR.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > This is what 43 limited did to me. I sold 35/2.8 and basically
> > > > > deprecated 50/1.7. It is there mostly because of sentimental value.
> > > > > After all, FA 50/1.7 was my first prime lens that taught me great many
> > > > > things about photography.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I still use the FA20-35 too ... it's such a good wide-normal zoom 
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > when I want to carry just one lens.
> > > > >
> > > > > For me it is Tamron 28-75/2.8. But I hear what you're saying ;-).
> > > > >
> > > > > Boris
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
> > > > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Boris
> > >
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
> > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Boris
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to