> > http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5035527265195980162 >
On 2/25/07, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simple and effective. I'm not sure that more depth of field would be an > advantage. It wouldn't be nearly as interesting if everything was in sharp > focus. > On 2/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ============ > I think on something like this, it would be better to have stronger DOF > throughout most of it. I.E. It doesn't quite work for me. > > Marnie aka Doe > Thanks to both of you for taking time to comment. My initial thoughts were that it needed more depth of field. Next time I'll try it both ways and see how it comes out. -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com Shoot more film! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
