True enough. But it would be nice to use some that I currently own, particularly those that are identical to the 645 variant (like the 300/4). Paul On Feb 27, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I think the joy I get from using a 645 or 6x6 is entirely in detail > resolution so I almost always put them on a tripod for everything. > > That said, I think almost anyone spending as much as a 645D is going > to cost for one will likely buy a couple of the 645 lenses for it. > > G > > On Feb 27, 2007, at 8:10 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > >> I wouldn't be too sure about that. The 645 was much more of a field >> camera, (in fact the 67 was more of a field camera), and the digital >> version, will be one as well. Studio cameras tended to have removable >> backs, and digital studio cameras tend to be tethered. I think many >> users will be looking to use this camera for high quality nature >> photography. >> >> Paul Stenquist wrote: >>> Doesn't much matter. Anyone who uses 67 lenses with a 645D will >>> probably be using it in the studio or on sticks for a location shoot. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
