Profiles generally offer some improvement over other methods of printing that tend to be more hit and miss. I once used ColorSynch workflow, and I was completely happy with my results, but Godders talked me into printing with the profiles and color management turned off. I have to say the results are superior, particularly on difficult prints, such as those with a lot of shadow detail. Paul On Feb 28, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
> I got a question. > I tend to use the Ilford papers and the Costco Glossy 95% of the time, > but > have used others like the Museo. I have seldom had a problem getting a > good > print, but I always use the settings to make the software set the print > requirements, not the printer, other than setting a paper type (not by > name > but Prem Gloss or enhanced matte, ie, etc). > I am using the Epson 220 and 1800 printers and PSE5. > My monitor was recently calibrated, but it was so very close to what I > had > done by eyeball that I can not determoine any difference. > My question, or rather a statement, is, if I feel that I like my > results, > will there be that much difference between "now" and "if I set up some > other > way using profiles, etc"? > I personally find it hard to believe that I can get much better prints > than > I already do. Please don't take this as bragging, just wondering to > what > nth degree you folks are working toward :-) > > Walt > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
