Quite sure. A was careful focusing correctly. But there's alwayas a chance that tests can be better. Anyway, the sharpness of the M4/200mm shot, cant' be a focusing mistake!, can it?
Jens Bladt Latest photographs: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/ http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Peter Lacus Sendt: 28. februar 2007 22:03 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: Re: How about Pentax M 135/3.5 and M 200/4.0? Jens, > I have a M 4/200mm as well. I have tested it against some fine lenses, like > the FA* 2.8/80-200mm > It's better than I thought it would be: > > http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/0830-PM-200-56.jpg > http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/1197-PTX-200mm-F56.jpg wow, that's quite a difference, are you sure it wasn't caused by auto focus or something? Cheers, Peter -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/705 - Release Date: 02/27/2007 15:24 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.5/706 - Release Date: 02/28/2007 16:09 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
