Aaaarghhh, enabled! http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=290085495701
Just a hazard bid, done a hour and a hlf before end of the auction. Hard to believe that no one else bid on this. Well, in the bottom of my heart I'm a prime guy, I'll report how I like it, and will try to post some samples. Pancho Joseph Tainter schrieb: > "I believe Joe Tainter did that some time ago. His conclusion was that > it's almost a toss up on performance ... they both perform very well, > the DA21 is slightly better on some aspects." > > Correct. They are very close in terms of sharpness. > > In shooting, the DA 21 does have some barrel distortion. I never really > evaluated the FA 20 for that. > > > "I only had a Pentax FA20 once for a very short evaluation and found > it to be an excellent performer, better than my Canon 20/2.8." > > Photodo says so also. > > I can't bring myself to give up my FA 20, even through it will probably > come out of my travel kit if I get the DA* 16-50 F2.8. > > Joe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
