32BC? Last I checked the consensus was around 3BC, with the crucifixion in 33 AD. When did it change?
-Adam graywolf wrote: > Us Mayans disagree with you, as do the Buddhists, Jews, and Muslims. The > historical information actually seems to indicate that JC was born in > 32BC. The Causality Police are still investigating. > > -graywolf, who sworn he was not going to comment on this thread. So you > guys are responsible for my going to hell as forsworn, I will spend > eternity there cursing the lot of you <GRIN>. > > BTW: Scientist types no longer use BC and AD, but PE and CE. > > -- > > Joseph Tainter wrote: >> I'm not talking about the date he was actually born, which was never >> unequivocally stated. You're correct that so-called Christianity >> adopted the date of a pagan holiday. >> >> I was talking in the sense that we use a nomenclature that refers to >> things as B.C. and A.D, with the implicit recognition that our counting >> of years, forwards or backwards is based on the year Christ was born. >> >> Tom C. >> >> ----- >> >> Compounding things, Christ was actually born around 6 to 4 B.C. That is, >> Christ was born Before Christ. >> >> This site is interesting: >> >> http://www.westarinstitute.org/Periodicals/4R_Articles/Dionysius/dionysius.html >> >> except that Dionysius Exiguus was born in what is now Romania, not Russia. >> >> Religions take time to evolve a fully-fledged belief system. Moslems, of >> course, eschew graven images. Yet 7th century Islamic coins in the Near >> East copied Byzantine forms, with many early Islamic coins showing the >> emperor holding a cross. >> >> This must be what the PDML is about. We are an evolving cosmology. So >> these posts are not OT after all. >> >> I may be in Israel in mid April. I'll try to stop by this tomb and get >> everyone the definitive answer. >> >> But I am still trying to figure out how the Swiss Navy fits in. >> >> Joe >> > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
