Acutually, I have been signing my images with copyrights on all the 
stuff I have previously
put on the web - because the web images are not intended to be ones 
people print.

what smugmug does is add a watermark to the images as seen on whatever 
galleries you
ask them to watermark - but the watermarks are never on the original 
files and you can
take them off and put them on at their site at will...

I didn't think of watermarks as copyright info, though, just as 
something that would appear
when someone tried to print you images and make them funky as a result.

smugmug takes care of applying them to all images for viewing on the web 
that I chose -
but they claim they dont bother if your original image is small/low res.

thanks for the info, Godders

ann

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

>I've been putting watermarks on the larger versions of my image files  
>in the PAW set for a while. An example can be seen here:
>
>http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/large/03-half.jpg
>
>That's actually little bolder/more intrusive than I would prefer, but  
>putting in watermarks is fussy and depends on the base image. I've  
>got a Photoshop script that does that style which I've been meaning  
>to re-work.
>
>Lightroom can also apply a simple watermark to an image on Export but  
>I see no explicit way of controlling where it appears or what font/ 
>size/transparency is applied. For example, here were two files  
>exported at the same time:
>
>http://homepage.mac.com/godders/by-the-window-2187a.jpg
>http://homepage.mac.com/godders/friends-2188.jpg
>
>What's in the watermark will be what you've applied to the image in  
>the IPTC metadata "copyright" tag. EG:
>
>http://homepage.mac.com/godders/tp-2271.jpg
>
>Aside from the content of the watermark and the style you want to  
>use, if you need to watermark a bunch of existing JPEGs, various have  
>recommended iWatermark in the past.
>   http://www.scriptsoftware.com/iwatermark/
>I've not actually used it yet myself but it sure looks like a good  
>tool to try.
>
>Godfrey
>
>On Mar 2, 2007, at 11:03 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>  
>
>>So now I'm signed up on smugmug -
>>when quickly uploaded my ashley calendar pics and chose smugmug
>>watermark I got a
>>large and too concealing "proof" across the center of the image...
>>
>>one is permitted to use one's own watermark
>>which I figure I would like to just be my copyright very faint  
>>along the
>>bottom,
>>but I've seen others that are a faint texture across the whole image.
>>
>>what have you guys been using?
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to