I'm pretty sure that's one of the reasons why Nikon started making its 
own lighting modifiers(Diffuser, filters), especially the diffuser for 
the SB-800. That way they could test the system with the modifiers in place.

If I'm doing anything more complicated than bounce umbrellas, I shoot in 
manual. Way more predictable.


Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Light modifiers are bounce cards, diffusers, umbrellas, light spheres,
> etc.  Where I could imagine the problem is that the pre-flash systems
> only send out a very small pop to determine exposure.  The situation
> becomes somewhat like when you try to meter past the capability of the
> meter - like old stop down - so the pre-flash is small and the light
> modifier cuts 3 stops of light and the little pop didn't put out 3
> stops to begin with.  Now the reading would be incorrect and the main
> flash pop would be too strong.  Not saying it would always happen, but
> I could imagine problems with some kinds of modifiers - especially the
> stronger diffusers.
> 
> In some situations, taking a shot and then looking at the histogram
> would work well.  In wedding photography, that would mostly not work -
> you can't afford a test shot most of the time.
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to