Bill, > DSLR cameras are showing 10 stops or more of dynamic range, which is about 3 > stops more than that of print film, probably 5 stops more range than slide > film.
IMHO there's only one definitive truth - film emulsions react to the light in a different way than linear digital sensors. Indeed it's much easier to extract useful data from digital RAW files but does it prove that digital sensor captures wider dynamic range? IMHO it proves that current scanners are not capable of extracting data from the film more than anything else. Cheers, Peter -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
