Well, only 8 stops out of print film has got
to be a mistake of some sorts, I have
seen numbers reported as high as 15 stops
out this type of film and I know for
a fact there is like 3 stops of LATITUDE
alone on the good slow color neg films,
(not to be confused with dynamic
range )which would be impossible if there
was only 8 stops total range.

I did some tests with the DS shooting
RAW and found that I was unable to record
capture what I could easily see, even using
raw. The exposure latitude with that camera is
much smaller than color neg film.

jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 3:55 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: beauty shot: Pentax K10D- 17mm lenses are out there



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Lacus"
Subject: Re: beauty shot: Pentax K10D- 17mm lenses are out there


> Bill,
>
>> DSLR cameras are showing 10 stops or more of dynamic range, which is
>> about 3
>> stops more than that of print film, probably 5 stops more range than 
>> slide
>> film.
>
> IMHO there's only one definitive truth - film emulsions react to the 
> light in a different way than linear digital sensors. Indeed it's much

> easier to extract useful data from digital RAW files but does it prove

> that digital sensor captures wider dynamic range? IMHO it proves that 
> current scanners are not capable of extracting data from the film more

> than anything else.

I'd have to dig out my charts from when I was learning the Zone System,
but 
my recollection is that I was never able to get more than 9-10 stops out
of 
B&W film without going to very exotic processing methods.
My experience working as a QC technician in the photo lab industry
indicated 
to me that print film, when measured on a densitometer, was incapable of

givng more than 7-8 stops of dynamic range.

My observations were not dependant on scanner limitations or paper
dynamic 
ranges, but on direct measurement of film samples using a device
designed 
specifically for that purpose.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to