I don't think it would be a Limited candidate. It would probably be more suited to a DA* nomenclature, IMO.
2007/3/9, Henk Terhell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > A DA 28/2.0 would be more expensive and therefore fit in the range of > limited lenses. There doesn't seem to be room in current Pentax ranges > for a straight-forward non-limited 28/2.8 prime lens (unfortunately). > > Henk > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff > > Sent: 08 March, 2007 11:24 PM > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: Re: Lens Roadmap > > > > > > Of course they could. My A28/2.0 took a 49mm filter. > > > > Shel > > > > > > > [Original Message] > > > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi > > > > > I think they could design a 28mm f/2 that would still fit a 49mm > > > diameter filter. I want it the same size as a 43 Limited, > > or as close > > > as sensibly possible, with the same styling/finish as the > > DA21, DA70 > > > and FA43... > > > > > > But I'm not demanding. ;-) > > > > > > G > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
