I haven't dealt with calendar printers. But both Ken Waller and Annsan 
have printed calendars, perhaps they will respond. The printed NY Times 
pic was very close to what I saw on the monitor in regard to color. 
Their web version was a bit oversaturated. I sent tham Adobe 98 files.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:

> Thanks Paul
> have you dealt with  printing houses too like I would have for the 
> calendar?
> As far as I know they print in CMYK.
> How much did your newspaper published photos differ in color from your
> monitor/printer output? Just darker or did colors change somehow too 
> beside
> less brilliance?
> greetings
> Markus
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Paul Stenquist
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 4:52 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PESO:just a first K10D test photo with flash
>
>
> I haven't tried printing from srgb. I get good results with Adobe 98,
> so I'm happy. I have converted files to srgb for minlab processing.
> That seems to work fine.
> Paul
> On Mar 9, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Markus Maurer wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul
>> I assume your Epson 2200/2400 works with sRGB too? Most "consumer"
>> scanner
>> or print equipment does, right?
>> Have you ever tried comparing different color spaces on high end
>> printers?
>> I wonder how much I would loose --> in print  <-- with typical 
>> mountain
>> landscapes if I switch everything to sRGB.
>>
>>  http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/prophoto-rgb.shtml shows
>> quite
>> a loss with sRGB but I'm a bit afraid of managing "inivisible" colors
>> on my
>> monitor....
>>
>> greetings
>> Markus
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
>> Paul Stenquist
>> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 2:41 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: PESO:just a first K10D test photo with flash
>>
>>
>> Yes, most minilab processors are set up for srgb.
>> Paul
>> On Mar 9, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Bill Owens wrote:
>>
>>> When I worked in a lab using a Fuji processor, adobe RGB gave me a
>>> terrible
>>> blue cast.  Switching to sRGB fixed the problem.  This was with the
>>> IstD
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>>> Of
>>> Markus Maurer
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 5:43 PM
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: PESO:just a first K10D test photo with flash
>>>
>>> Hi Pentaxians
>>> still struggling on the new digital way I made this first flash shot
>>> with
>>> the AF280T in auto mode and bounced to the wall on the K10D
>>> set at ISO 100 and F5.6 of "Leo Leu Lowenzahn". I cropped it a bit 
>>> and
>>> sharpened in Photoshop but I'm still unable to set the tonal range as
>>> good
>>> in the
>>> raw converter as in Photoshop. That will have too wait a bit too.
>>> Experimenting with Adobe RGB, sRGB and ProPhotoRGB color space
>>> settings
>>> leaves me confused enough for today. Too much reading....
>>> I will have to go out tomorrow for some close-ups, that little 
>>> 18-55mm
>>> Kit
>>> lens will come handy for some first landscape test shots.
>>>
>>> http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/solicom/leoleu1.jpg
>>>
>>> greetings
>>> Markus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to