Hey I'm allowed to be wrong, it's freedom of speach. I do want a cheaper MZ-S tho but at the rate the prices are comming down I won't have to wait that long :)
--- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brendan wrote: > > > > Fine we'll bring back the Super Program just for > you. > > Brendan, your lineup has more duplication than the > current one. Why > have the MZ-5n and MZ-3 both there? The differences > are marginal. It > would be like keeping the MZ-5 and the MZ-5n in the > lineup. > > And why axe the MZ-30 without replacing it with a > low-cost alternative? > Or are you suggesting that Pentax should just drop > the price on the 7 to > the 30's level? Why not just suggest that Pentax > drop the price on the > MZ-S to the price of the MZ-5n, release a hybrid > digital/analog body for > $700 and make an LX with autofocus out of solid gold > for $999? That > would be a competitive lineup. > > All these posts about dropping the price on this or > that have to take > into account that Pentax are a company that needs to > make money. They > are smaller than Canon, and don't have an office > equipment division to > prop them up when the market is bad. They will > probably never deliver > the best camera ever for the lowest price ever. I > do believe that they > have more great cameras in them, but I believe that > we will have to pay > above-cheapest prices to get them. > > -Aaron Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
