yeah and sell it for the price they sell this 50-200 ? LOL 2007/3/14, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jeez, you would think they could at least do > F4 constant in the reduced APS format like they have > done in the past on FF 35mm format many times. > jco > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Bruce Dayton > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:33 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: The DA 50~200 > > > I have resisted buying it so far. I would prefer a better build quality > and a faster (constant) lens. It appears to be very good for the price. > My take is optical quality is better than expected for the price point, > but build quality is consumer level. > > -- > Bruce > > > Wednesday, March 14, 2007, 9:09:54 AM, you wrote: > > SB> Is the 50-200 supposed to be a "consumer" zoom - i.e., designed more > > SB> to a price point than the highest quality image? For those who use > SB> the lens, are you pleased with it. Paul, and a few others, seem to > SB> be quite happy with theirs, but what about those of you who don't > SB> often comment on such things? > > > SB> Shel > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
