But it's not definitive. The DA 12-24 samples were mine, and they  
were hand held. CA is dependent very much on the angle of the light.  
I would be surprised if the DA 14 were not better at 14mm than the DA  
12-24, but I wouldn't jump to any conclusions based on what you've  
read here.
Paul
On Mar 25, 2007, at 7:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote:

> Thanks, Godfrey. Exactly the sort of information I had in mind.
> Detailed and meaty.
> Considerate of you to take the time. :)
>
> Jack
>
> P.S.: Pop Photo's review actually included the word "pro" in  
> describing
> its build and image quality. MERCY!
> --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 25, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>> Anyone made at least a semi serious side-by-side DA 14 v DA
>> 12-24(at
>>> 14) image comparison?
>>> Godfrey?
>>
>> I recently looked at a couple of DA12-24 RAW demo files. There
>> weren't any that were captures at exactly 14mm. My prior impressions
>>
>> that it is a good lens but has more CA and more rectilinear
>> distortion than the DA14 does at lens openings and focal lengths
>> which bracket the DA14 were borne out. The f/8 exposures were
>> significant improvements over the f/4 exposures. But I don't own one
>>
>> so I can't do an exhaustive side-by-side unless someone wants to loan
>>
>> me one for testing.
>>
>> But those test shots inspired me to do some more exhaustive DA14 test
>>
>> shots on a variety of targets. My summary:
>>
>> - Some corner/edge light falloff is apparent until about f/5.
>> - Rendering characteristics vary depending upon focus setting and
>> lens opening, most are excellent particularly at f/4.5 and smaller
>> lens openings if working in the very near range.
>> - Corner and edge sharpness are satisfactory wide open but improve
>> greatly when stopped down to f/5-5.6, after which they continue to
>> improve a little but very slowly to f/11 or so.
>> - Much after f/11, diffraction effects begin to intrude on sharpness.
>> - Flare resistance is excellent even wide open.
>> - There is a small amount of CA, consistent at all lens openings,
>> which can be removed easily in Lightroom or Camera Raw.
>> - It is a demanding lens to focus critically when wide open and
>> focusing near the close-focus limits. At f/5.6 the DoF at normal
>> shooting distances is so great that it covers a multitude of sins,
>> but wide open and at close range you have to have it on the money. I
>>
>> go to manual focus and use Pentax Magnifier FB 2x for critical focus.
>> - Using a tripod with this wide a lens is essential to getting the
>> best resolution. Moving to the K10D, the incremental resolution
>> upgrade is most advantageous for this lens and the DA21 Limited.
>>
>> I've had the DA14 since I first bought the DS body and it is one of
>> my most consistent performers. I've made well over 3000 exposures
>> with it. The more I use it, the more I learn to exploit it, the more
>>
>> I like it.
>>
>> Compared to the Sigma 14mm f/2.8 and Canon EF14/2.8L that I tested,
>> the DA14 is a jewel and incredibly inexpensive for its quality.
>> Regards field of view coverage, comparing what I get from it against
>>
>> my old work done with Nikkor 20mm f/3.5 AI-S, Zeiss Biogon 21/3.5,
>> and Leica Elmarit-M 21/2.8 ASPH lenses, it holds its own very well.
>> It's not quite up to what I could get from the Hasselblad 903SWC's
>> Biogon 38mm f/4.5 ... but then very very few lenses in this class
>> are.
>>
>> BTW: set to Program mode and the MTF line, the camera tends to keep
>> it at f/5.6 most of the time, which is right in line with my
>> evaluations which indicated best performance between f/4.5 and f/5.6.
>>
>> Godfrey
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> ______________
> Now that's room service!  Choose from over 150,000 hotels
> in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to