Hi Nick It's a step in the right direction for me but lots of things are missing. Like an "about me" with your photo/bio or an "impressum". A "home" at home does not make sense. The title font is not very readable. The site is not google/robot friendly because it lacks keywords. Why is the domain not named after you or the services you offer, was it already occupied? A play on words is not good here IMHO, nobody expects "wedding photography" at a site called "phojonick.com". --> Your offerings are unclear to me: How many photos in what size do I get for $850 or $1'500? Raw/Jpg on CD or prints? How does that book look like. Really, you have to --> d e s c r i b e and s h o w crystal clear <-- what you have to offer Nick! The text on the portrait site is only h o t air instead of facts and figures. Did you visit other wedding photographers sites to see how they do it?
Greetings Markus -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Wright Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 4:42 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Web site review part the second Okay, so you all thought my last one sucked. I was trying to go for something specific, and apparently I failed pretty big. So I was digging around and found the code for my site I did back in early 2003. I still liked the layout so I updated it and put it up instead. I'm interested to know what you think of it. http://www.phojonick.com/ Thanks again. -- ~Nick Wright http://blog.phojonick.com/ http://www.phojonick.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

