Hi Nick
It's a step in the right direction for me but lots of things are missing.
Like an "about me" with your photo/bio or an "impressum".
A "home" at home does not make sense. The title font is not very readable.
The site is not google/robot friendly because it lacks keywords.
Why is the domain not named after you or the services you offer, was it
already occupied?  A play on words is not good here IMHO, nobody expects
"wedding photography" at a site called "phojonick.com". 
--> Your offerings are unclear to me: How many photos in what size do I get
for $850 or $1'500? Raw/Jpg on CD or prints? How does that book look like.
Really, you have to  --> d e s c r i b e and s h o w crystal clear <-- what
you have to offer Nick! The text on the portrait site is only h o t air
instead of facts and figures. Did you visit other wedding photographers
sites to see how they do it?

Greetings
Markus





-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Wright
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 4:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Web site review part the second

Okay, so you all thought my last one sucked. I was trying to go for
something specific, and apparently I failed pretty big.

So I was digging around and found the code for my site I did back in
early 2003. I still liked the layout so I updated it and put it up
instead.

I'm interested to know what you think of it.

http://www.phojonick.com/

Thanks again.

-- 
~Nick Wright
http://blog.phojonick.com/
http://www.phojonick.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to