I like the sharpened version better. Maybe somewhere in between would be a bit better.
Tom C wrote: > The unsharpened version... > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5774630 > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > >> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: PESO - Flow >> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:45:47 -0600 >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Tom C" >> Subject: PESO - Flow >> >> >> >>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5774291 >>> >>> >>> >> Not quite, but close. >> I would like to see either a longer exposure or a shorter one. There is a >> false sharpness to the image that I find disturbing. >> Also, your pictures deserve a Wisner. >> >> William Robb >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
