I think Paul would appreciate it if we did not turn this into the
great debate of legal systems.

I also think it took 110% of courage to even go to the lsit about this.

Lets give Steady the support the family needs.

Dave

On 3/26/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >it seems to me that, however difficult this particular situation is
> >for Paul and his family, a system that gives everybody access to the
> >law - in spite of some iniquities - is preferable to one that gives
> >access to the law only to rich people. Most modern democracies agree.
> >
> >Regards
> >Bob
> >
>
> Agreed, but define "rich".
>
> Access to the law and competent representation in a court of law are two
> different things (as I'm sure you know).
>
> Not commenting on Paul's case, but in the end the differentiation is lost if
> one has access to the law but justice is not done, either because of an
> incompetent judge, incompetent jury, incompetent attorney or plain lack of
> funds to get competent counsel.
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to